After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures across Europe, fresh technologies are actually reviving these systems. Right from lie recognition tools examined at the line to a program for validating documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of systems is being used by asylum applications. This article is exploring just how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. This reveals just how asylum seekers will be transformed into compelled hindered techno-users: They are asked to abide by a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unpredictable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their particular capacity to run these devices and to follow their legal right for protection.
It also illustrates how these technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering all of them from interacting with the stations of cover. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight into the disciplinary her latest blog mechanisms these technologies, by which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who have are self-disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article states that these technology have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double result: while they help to expedite the asylum method, they also make it difficult for the purpose of refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are really positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to bogus decisions manufactured by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.
